<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do Twitter users have an obligation to provide value?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/</link>
	<description>Quick hits on Social Media, Marketing, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc meyer</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/#comment-3461</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1784#comment-3461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Tony that attitude will take you far my friend. You truly understand not only the value of Twitter but of the act of being social online..value begets value as I am wont to say!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony that attitude will take you far my friend. You truly understand not only the value of Twitter but of the act of being social online..value begets value as I am wont to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Faustino</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/#comment-3457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony Faustino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1784#comment-3457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marc,
 
After reading this article, I couldn’t help but think about the points discussed in your April 16, 2009 article, We 2.0 is Better than Me 2.0.  There are many interesting parallels from that article that dovetail with this one.

When one engages other Twitter tweeps with a We 2.0 attitude (versus being a Twitter Taker), he/she reap tremendous professional benefits.  I’ve been using Twitter since March 2009, and it’s my favorite social media channel for sharing and learning professional knowledge (along with LinkedIn).  I gain worthwhile knowledge everyday from the trusted folks I follow. They are often a better source of content and professional learning than what I can efficiently locate with my own Google Search.

Therefore, I hope that I’m returning mutual value by sharing content that also benefits them professionally.  When someone RT’s one of my tweets, I feel like I accomplished something worthwhile.  I feel like I actually helped someone professionally (and I might not even know this individual personally or he/she could be halfway around the world).  I mean how cool is that!
 
Yeah, I know that everybody says that digital media tools are cutting-edge, new school, sexy and blah blah blah.  But guess what, there’s a real-life person at “the other end”, and he/she appreciates thoughtful engagement.  When using social media, old school rules like civility, good manners, and generosity still apply.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc,</p>
<p>After reading this article, I couldn’t help but think about the points discussed in your April 16, 2009 article, We 2.0 is Better than Me 2.0.  There are many interesting parallels from that article that dovetail with this one.</p>
<p>When one engages other Twitter tweeps with a We 2.0 attitude (versus being a Twitter Taker), he/she reap tremendous professional benefits.  I’ve been using Twitter since March 2009, and it’s my favorite social media channel for sharing and learning professional knowledge (along with LinkedIn).  I gain worthwhile knowledge everyday from the trusted folks I follow. They are often a better source of content and professional learning than what I can efficiently locate with my own Google Search.</p>
<p>Therefore, I hope that I’m returning mutual value by sharing content that also benefits them professionally.  When someone RT’s one of my tweets, I feel like I accomplished something worthwhile.  I feel like I actually helped someone professionally (and I might not even know this individual personally or he/she could be halfway around the world).  I mean how cool is that!</p>
<p>Yeah, I know that everybody says that digital media tools are cutting-edge, new school, sexy and blah blah blah.  But guess what, there’s a real-life person at “the other end”, and he/she appreciates thoughtful engagement.  When using social media, old school rules like civility, good manners, and generosity still apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isabelle O&#8217;Kane &#187; Normal &#8220;converstion&#8221; rules apply, &#38; don&#8217;t forget to be polite</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/#comment-3441</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Isabelle O&#8217;Kane &#187; Normal &#8220;converstion&#8221; rules apply, &#38; don&#8217;t forget to be polite]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1784#comment-3441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] came accross this article which asks &#8220;Do Twitter users have an obligation to provide value?&#8221;, it very nicely sums up what we all (should) inherently understand&#8230;but I feel it&#8217;s nice [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came accross this article which asks &#8220;Do Twitter users have an obligation to provide value?&#8221;, it very nicely sums up what we all (should) inherently understand&#8230;but I feel it&#8217;s nice [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc meyer</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/#comment-3433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marc meyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 12:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1784#comment-3433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree-when you&#039;re in the zone, everything is free and easy and loose-problem is some get caught up in the &quot;me&quot; aspect of what they are doing on Twitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree-when you&#8217;re in the zone, everything is free and easy and loose-problem is some get caught up in the &#8220;me&#8221; aspect of what they are doing on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adhansen</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/06/03/do-twitter-users-have-an-obligation-to-provide-value/#comment-3432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adhansen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 11:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1784#comment-3432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Co-mmunicate.  Con-verse.  Co-llaborate.  Social media overall, and Twitter in particular, are all about sharing things &quot;with&quot; our peers.  And as in any healthy relationship, the emphasis is not placed on calculating the proportion of give and take.  When you&#039;re in the zone, give and take naturally work themselves out, and if you have chosen your peers wisely, they&#039;re not spending too much time on enforcing any kind of strict 50/50 proportion either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Co-mmunicate.  Con-verse.  Co-llaborate.  Social media overall, and Twitter in particular, are all about sharing things &#8220;with&#8221; our peers.  And as in any healthy relationship, the emphasis is not placed on calculating the proportion of give and take.  When you&#8217;re in the zone, give and take naturally work themselves out, and if you have chosen your peers wisely, they&#8217;re not spending too much time on enforcing any kind of strict 50/50 proportion either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

