<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ROI-Return On Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/05/28/roi-return-on-influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/05/28/roi-return-on-influence/</link>
	<description>Quick hits on Social Media, Marketing, and Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:06:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is time-on-site a useful measure for online communities? &#124; FreshNetworks Blog</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/05/28/roi-return-on-influence/#comment-3444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is time-on-site a useful measure for online communities? &#124; FreshNetworks Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1767#comment-3444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  ROI-Return On Influence  (directmarketingobservations.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  ROI-Return On Influence  (directmarketingobservations.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niall Cook</title>
		<link>http://directmarketingobservations.com/2009/05/28/roi-return-on-influence/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niall Cook]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://directmarketingobservations.com/?p=1767#comment-3412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for keeping the debate going. I think it&#039;s an important one. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but what you are saying is that a whole raft of influence &#039;indicators&#039; can be measured. With that I agree (although we can all debate whether they are the right indicators).

But each one of those indicators does not equal influence. Influence is at best a combination of those things, and probably some other stuff too (which definitely cannot be measured). The problem I have is that I don&#039;t see anyone trying to define that magic combination that might help us measure influence, but maybe I just haven&#039;t looked hard enough.

That&#039;s why I say it&#039;s futile. Maybe it&#039;s semantics here but if we actually mean reach, let&#039;s talk about measuring reach - not influence. They are not the same thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for keeping the debate going. I think it&#8217;s an important one. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but what you are saying is that a whole raft of influence &#8216;indicators&#8217; can be measured. With that I agree (although we can all debate whether they are the right indicators).</p>
<p>But each one of those indicators does not equal influence. Influence is at best a combination of those things, and probably some other stuff too (which definitely cannot be measured). The problem I have is that I don&#8217;t see anyone trying to define that magic combination that might help us measure influence, but maybe I just haven&#8217;t looked hard enough.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I say it&#8217;s futile. Maybe it&#8217;s semantics here but if we actually mean reach, let&#8217;s talk about measuring reach &#8211; not influence. They are not the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

